Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1355

reference
834-tree-1
name
1355
tree-preservation-order

undefined

834-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.049011 50.856378)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.048955 50.856372,-1.048957 50.856383,-1.048965 50.856393,-1.048977 50.856401,-1.048993 50.856407,-1.049011 50.856408,-1.049028 50.856407,-1.049044 50.856402,-1.049057 50.856394,-1.049065 50.856384,-1.049068 50.856373,-1.049066 50.856362,-1.049058 50.856352,-1.049045 50.856344,-1.049030 50.856338,-1.049012 50.856337,-1.048995 50.856338,-1.048979 50.856343,-1.048966 50.856351,-1.048958 50.856361,-1.048955 50.856372)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL